Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:43
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Stress hormones: Why quick fixes won't lower our cortisol levels - BBC
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sea spiders found farming methane-eating microbes in cultivated biofilm - Phys.org
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Rory McIlroy Says He Shot 81 at Oakmont Last Week - Sports Illustrated
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What movies have not aged well?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Phillies Place Bryce Harper On 10-Day IL Due To Wrist Inflammation - MLB Trade Rumors
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
US Food and Drug Administration Launches AI Platform to 'Modernize' Agency - Decrypt